i often see in such circles, those who debate the question of whether futa is gay, and i am no stranger to thisconcept as it is one i have pondered before, consider the following, would two grown men utilizing marital aids mimicking female anatomy (such as plain flesh lights) in intercourse be considered homo or heterosexual?
in my opinion, such a transaction would still be considered as homosexual intercourse. vice versa, if two females were to have same sex intercourse while using more phallic marital aids, i would still identify the couple as homosexual (same sex, although lesbian is also a valid term).
My personal idea that i take away from this idea is that two females with male anatomy (or y'know "futas" ) would still be considered a lesbian interaction and thus, my opinion is futa on female and futa on futa is still lesbian respectively. this of course however is simply my stance and those of you who have more concern for other factors are free to feel a different way than i do, and i almost invite you to share your perspective but I understand such openness may not lead to particularly civil discussion...
It does not appear wholly homosexual to me if the partner is female, although the act of a male having intercourse with a phallic object being considered homoerotic seems more dependent on personal opinion as I could understand arguments more both sides... quite curious where others may draw the line, no?
I’m a man and doing it with phallic objects very often. If I’m onset it enhances my orgasm Avery time. Butt I’m not gay because I would not do it if I imagined the dick being attached to a man. It just works if she has a dick. I think that this is a really interesting question and I hope I helped someone with this commentary.
So what do you think am I gay or not? I think we need a hole new gender for this!
Add new comment
i often see in such circles, those who debate the question of whether futa is gay, and i am no stranger to this concept as it is one i have pondered before, consider the following, would two grown men utilizing marital aids mimicking female anatomy (such as plain flesh lights) in intercourse be considered homo or heterosexual?
in my opinion, such a transaction would still be considered as homosexual intercourse. vice versa, if two females were to have same sex intercourse while using more phallic marital aids, i would still identify the couple as homosexual (same sex, although lesbian is also a valid term).
My personal idea that i take away from this idea is that two females with male anatomy (or y'know "futas" ) would still be considered a lesbian interaction and thus, my opinion is futa on female and futa on futa is still lesbian respectively. this of course however is simply my stance and those of you who have more concern for other factors are free to feel a different way than i do, and i almost invite you to share your perspective but I understand such openness may not lead to particularly civil discussion...
Gay, guy dicked down. Girl x FUTA on girl is gay but from guy side is straight cause girl getting dicked
It does not appear wholly homosexual to me if the partner is female, although the act of a male having intercourse with a phallic object being considered homoerotic seems more dependent on personal opinion as I could understand arguments more both sides... quite curious where others may draw the line, no?
Girl on the last page boutta start goin off bout honor an being the world's greatest swordsman LMFAO
Pages